Thursday, February 23, 2006

dustin has done a nice lil' recap on his cadaver politik blog, do check it out. He has also inititated a fun little project of cartoons About jesus, much in the spirit of what I have posted lately.

"The response by Muslims to some stupid cartoons makes it REALLY hard to sympathize with them, and reminds me once again why I fucking hate religion. However, despite all the coverage of this every bloody day (how many news stories on this did YOU hear before they actually told you what the cartoon actually portrayed?), unless you listen to DemocracyNow! you probably didn't know that this has nothing to do with Free Speech or Freedom of the Press. Why do I say that? Because apparently there were similar cartoons lampooning Jesus submitted for publication previously, and the editor of this Danish paper decided not to print them -- because it would just upset people. Hmm . . . So this fucker made a conscious, deliberate choice to publish cartoons portraying the Prophet Muhammed as a suicide bomber and NOT to publish the cartoons making fun of Jesus. In other words, "I don't care if we upset Muslims, cause I don't like them anyway." And while of course the leader of Iran is an antisemetic psychopath, I think his call for a cartoon competition about the Holocaust makes an excellent point about the double standard in place and the clear racism involved. For my part, I hereby invite you to participate in a Cartoons About Jesus contest; send me images and I will post them. Kari has already started us off."

you simply MUST join in on the fun.

as for myself, it's nearly 6 a.m. and i've been up for two hours. a combination of a toothache and the huge amount of excederin (largely caffeine-based) have made it impossible to go back to sleep.

i've been doing a little bit of watching on this whole Bush/Ports deal, and although i'm not 100 percent knowledgeable on the subject, i have a hard time believing after all we have learned about our administration that ANYONE is surprised by the whole fiasco.

it's no big secret that our administration has close ties to saudi arabia. do i think it will make us less secure? i don't know if it would make us any less secure than bush flying the bin ladens out of the country right after 9/11. i don't know if it makes us any less secure than bush saying "bring them on" regarding the insurgents that HE didn't have to face. i don't know if it makes us any less secure than our country being the world police and administering "justice" to everyone but ourselves. i think it's just one more thing in a whole pile of other things that should make everyone pretty fucking nervous.

and for the bush supporters who voted that dumb bastard back into office:

YOU HELPED BRING THIS ON.

DON'T YOU DARE BE SURPRISED AT THIS. IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT HE WAS TIED SO CLOSELY TO THE UAE, IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW HE IS CAPABLE OF THREATENING OUR SECURITY, THEN YOU DIDN'T DO YOUR HOMEWORK BEFORE CASTING YOUR BALLOT. SHAME ON YOU.

HE IS NOT THE COMMON MAN. HE IS A MAN IN BED WITH MONEY AND CORPORATIONS AND THE ELITE. AND IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT, NOW YOU DO, AND I HOPE YOU SEE THAT THIS MAN WOULD SELL HIS MOTHER TO MAKE HIS TIES TO OIL STRONGER.

i am thinking less and less of my original theory that he is too stupid to be malicious, too ignorant to know any better. i think he is smarter than anyone gave him credit for and for that, WE ARE FUCKED. at the very least, he's smart enough to know that we as the public are apparently too stupid, too apathetic to do anything to change things.

wow. 6:09 a.m. and i'm furious.

time to get the kiddo ready for school.

5 comments:

Swedophilia said...

I agree with what your friend wrote about the cartoons. I have been living in Sweden and so received some up close scnadinavian coverage of this debacle. There was joint Danish-swedish butter company that provided nearly all the butter to certain arab states. They showed how powerful a boycott can be by not buying this product...they lose £millions a day and have had to send hundreds of staff home because of it.

I have today learnt of protests by a small number of muslims in England that have been frownded upon by other muslims and then subsequently ovebrlown by our media claiming some kind of islamic revolution.

The cartoons were desigend to shock and have just crippled Denmark's economy. The jesus cartoons would have caused less offence around the globe on the whole...except in certian silly parts of the USA. The reason? Muslims have had a rough time recently. They are unhappy at the completely unjust persecution and occupation of palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq have both been invaded and now thanks to all the lies surrounding the world trade centre, muslims are now seemingly synonymous with terrorism. They are sore form all this abuse and suspicion, mocking them in a cartoon was just going to overspill this anger.

“it's no big secret that our administration has close ties to saudi arabia”

You are correct, I would go even further as to say Saudi Arabia is a 100% puppet government copmpletely controlled by the Us.

You are also right about the Bin Laden being flown out…I am never quite aware of how much the americans are exposed too. But there are obviously intelligent people like you and your mate out there who aren't blinkered & blind, realising that all this talk of “freedom” and “democracy” is a big con and the USA is a very controlled, evil regime.

There is a book I can highly recommend to you. It was brought out very soon after 9?11 and was the first to draw attention to all the holes in it, long before commercial Moore got his stickyfingers all over the information.

The man who wrote it was universally castigated in the early 90s by the British media, his character completely assasinated because of some comments he makes. His works are described as “conspiracy theories” Yes, he does have some strange theories that he doesn't force you to believe, but 95% of his books are cold, hard fact, but because of his reputation, no one will touch him.

The book is called “Alice in wonderland and the world trade center disaster” by david icke. I highly recommend it and if you haven't heard about it, I know you will like it.

ungeziefer said...

Interesting . . . From a reviewer on Amazon.com:

"LIZARDS. . . . The author of this book is an ex English soccer player and sports commentator who had a nervous breakdown and went, well...nuts. He belives, for example, that the UK royal family are really lizards wearing disguises. Seriously, this is true..check it out."

Sounds plausible.

Have not yet read this one. But I do highly recommend "The War On Freedom" by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed.

(I also read "The New Pearl Harbor" by David Ray Griffin -- but that one's a bit over-the-top at times.)

Anyway.

The people who are surprised by this port deal are the people who thought (probably still think) 9/11 was completely out of the blue and that invading the one country in the Middle East with no ties to terrorism was a wise and strategic move in the "War On Terror" and good for our "National Security."

Ah well.

kari said...

i like that a dialogue has begun!

ungeziefer said...

And yet another example in a line of many in which Bush Co. has put politics and personal vendettas before "National Security" (I always have to put that phrase in quotes, because I'm not sure what it actually means anymore . . .)

How Neo-Cons Sabotaged Iran's Help on al Qaeda

ungeziefer said...

A good roundup of the absurdity of the media regarding this port deal here.

Does NO ONE remember John Kerry pointing this stuff out many many times -- including in the goddamned presidential debates??

Ah well.